Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 01:18:20PM +0100, Nick Hilliard: > The second adds a note to say that both the receiving and the sending > party should explicitly filter out more-specifics unless they're tagged > with BLACKHOLE. I would be in favour of seeing this noted in the > security considerations section, as it is a security related problem.
though I agree with you, that seems unrelated to blackholing, and thus out of scope. an informational rfc about best standard practices toward being a positive functioning member of the DFZ would be a better place for that; which may already exist unbeknownst to me. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
