On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:49:11PM -0700, Ebben Aries wrote: > Yes, support - Thank you for putting this together > > Few minor comments > > Section 1 > - Minor spelling/wording errors > - s/guidace/guidance/g > - s/with the requiring the explicity/with requiring the explicit/
Fixed. > Section 3 > - "Software MUST NOT require a configuration directive to operate in > this mode." - Since there could very well be a configuration option to > disable this capability (as noted in this same section), this should > rather be worded that this mode is default. It could very well be > delivered via a default and/or hidden configuration directive. (You may > also want to re-enable this capability after previously disabling it) Would "Software MUST operate in this mode by default." be a better phrasing? Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
