On 08/13/2016 10:31 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:49:11PM -0700, Ebben Aries wrote:
>> Yes, support - Thank you for putting this together
>>
>> Few minor comments
>>
>> Section 1
>> - Minor spelling/wording errors
>>   - s/guidace/guidance/g
>>   - s/with the requiring the explicity/with requiring the explicit/
> 
> Fixed.

ack

> 
>> Section 3
>> - "Software MUST NOT require a configuration directive to operate in
>> this mode." - Since there could very well be a configuration option to
>> disable this capability (as noted in this same section), this should
>> rather be worded that this mode is default.  It could very well be
>> delivered via a default and/or hidden configuration directive. (You may
>> also want to re-enable this capability after previously disabling it)
> 
> Would "Software MUST operate in this mode by default." be a better
> phrasing?
> 

sounds good to me

Thx

/ebben

> Kind regards,
> 
> Job
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
> 

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to