On 08/13/2016 10:31 AM, Job Snijders wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:49:11PM -0700, Ebben Aries wrote: >> Yes, support - Thank you for putting this together >> >> Few minor comments >> >> Section 1 >> - Minor spelling/wording errors >> - s/guidace/guidance/g >> - s/with the requiring the explicity/with requiring the explicit/ > > Fixed.
ack > >> Section 3 >> - "Software MUST NOT require a configuration directive to operate in >> this mode." - Since there could very well be a configuration option to >> disable this capability (as noted in this same section), this should >> rather be worded that this mode is default. It could very well be >> delivered via a default and/or hidden configuration directive. (You may >> also want to re-enable this capability after previously disabling it) > > Would "Software MUST operate in this mode by default." be a better > phrasing? > sounds good to me Thx /ebben > Kind regards, > > Job > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
