On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 08:36:29AM -0700, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Thanks for the discussion. My conclusion after that (and now that I'm > back from vacation myself) is that I'm in the rough along with the > others (Nick, Randy) who have expressed concerns at approving this > document.
Thank you for your time reviewing this! > I'd also note that the discussion of the PRs [1,2] that Nick created > after -03 was published doesn't seem to me to have reached a > conclusion. That's probably down to it being vacation time but I hope > folks do finish up the discussion of those. > > [1] > https://github.com/draft-ietf-grow-blackholing/draft-ietf-grow-blackholing/pull/1/files This was addressed here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03603.html > [2] > https://github.com/draft-ietf-grow-blackholing/draft-ietf-grow-blackholing/pull/2/files This was brought to conclusion here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03609.html Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
