On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:28:50PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> I support the draft.
> I also support Jeff's idea to re-use existing sub-code(s).
Thanks for your support. Based on the feedback received so far the next
version of this draft will recycle Cease subcode 2.
> 1 possible comment: the length of the "Shutdown Communication" field
> seems implied from the length of the data field, rather than being
> explicitly indicated.
The text is explicit about the length:
"followed by a freeform UTF-8 encoded string with a REQUIRED maximum
length of 128 octets. "
and further:
"This document tries to minimize the effects of visual spoofing by
allowing UNICODE only where local script is expected and needed, and
by limiting the length of the Shutdown Communication."
> If so, it seems that we are closing the possibility to advertise
> additional data/usage, in some future. What about adding a TLV format?
I object to using a TLV. Don't forget this is already at a TLV level:
Cease NOTIFICATION. If one would want to define a TLV inside this TLV, a
new Cease subcode can be requested from IANA.
Kind regards,
Job
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
