On 11/20/16 3:21 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote: > > > > I'd like to ask the chairs to move > 'draft-ietf-idr-operational-message-00' to 'Dead' status. > > It bothers you so much that it is a WG doc ? > > Or is the issue that it does not define fixed field for plain > telephone number to dial ? > Not revved since 2012 seems like a problem.
To me the sticking point with expressing more complex information as with proposed dump state and control tlvs involves the opportunity to hose up signaling in new interesting ways. Whether I think they should be more expressive or not; job's proposal has the inherent safety of arriving on a cease which I'm pretty sure doesn't leave much to the imagination. > R. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
