+1 - it makes lots of sense. Thomas
> On 7 Mar 2017, at 21:08, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > > Susan Hares wrote: >> This email is to make you aware of the discussion on the Extended >> Messages draft (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-21). Do you >> want the message size extended for all BGP messages or just UPDATE >> messages? This probably is more important if you want to have a >> larger size OPEN, ROUTE-REFESH, and UPDATES. The IDR co-chairs >> value the operational input from GROW WG. > > I don't see any reason an extended message size should be limited to > just UPDATEs. Enke's suggestion for handling the single anomalous case > (OPEN) looks reasonable. I'd say, go for it! > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > GROW@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
