>>> me and Job Snijders have recently submitted >>> draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cones-00, which discusses AS-Cones, an attempt >>> to bring as-sets into RPKI to facilitate route filtering. >> >> in irr, an as-set may reference an as-set. could you explain the >> authority model you have for this when as-sets are signed? > > My initial thinking for RPKI AS Cones, is that a given Cone in an > ASN's namespace can only be defined by the owner of the ASN in who's > namespace the Cone is defined.
namespace? isn't this the irr authorisation model? and how did that work out for us? > The draft needs a ton of work to properly communicate to implementers > what goes where. it would benefit from a bit of work on the authority and attestation model first. randy _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
