On 5/23/18 10:16 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:09 PM Nick Hilliard <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     This errata report isn't wrong, but belongs to a bigger category of
>     problems relating to how the IETF handles third party references
>     in RFCs.
>
>     It's unlikely that the researchgate url will be persistent in the
>     longer
>     term, at least any more than any other URL.
>
>
> ​I marked it as Hold for Document Update -- this seems to be the
> "best" way to annotate documents with things like this. ​
>
More generally the citation accurately describes the paper. At some
point in the future when we are long dead, it will still be a reference
to the paper.

Assuming that there is a method by which we can stably maintain
references to documents through URLs over the course of decades is
misguided.

> Thanks!
> W
>
>  
>
>
>     Nick
>
>     RFC Errata System wrote:
>     > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7948,
>     > "Internet Exchange BGP Route Server Operations".
>     >
>     > --------------------------------------
>     > You may review the report below and at:
>     > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5366
>     >
>     > --------------------------------------
>     > Type: Technical
>     > Reported by: Greg Skinner <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >
>     > Section: 6.2
>     >
>     > Original Text
>     > -------------
>     > [RS-ARCH]  Govindan, R., Alaettinoglu, C., Varadhan, K., and D.
>     >             Estrin, "A Route Server Architecture for Inter-Domain
>     >             Routing", 1995,
>     >             <http://www.cs.usc.edu/assets/003/83191.pdf>.
>     >
>     > Corrected Text
>     > --------------
>     > [RS-ARCH]  Govindan, R., Alaettinoglu, C., Varadhan, K., and D.
>     >             Estrin, "A Route Server Architecture for Inter-Domain
>     >             Routing", 1995,
>     > <https://www.researchgate.net/
>     > publication/
>     > 2297181_A_Route_Server_Architecture_for_Inter-Domain_Routing>
>     >
>     > Notes
>     > -----
>     > The paper is no longer accessible from the www.cs.usc.edu
>     <http://www.cs.usc.edu> site.  A related paper can be accessed at
>     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00008-7
>     <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552%2898%2900008-7> by those who
>     are registered members or will pay for the paper.  It would be
>     cited as:
>     > [RS-ARCH]  Govindan, R., Alaettinoglu, C., Varadhan, K., and D.
>     >                    Estrin, "A Route Server Architecture for
>     Inter-Domain
>     >                    Routing", Computer Networks and ISDN Systems,
>     Volume 30,
>     >                    Issue 12, 13 July 1998, Pages 1157-1174,
>     >                   
>     <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00008-7
>     <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552%2898%2900008-7>>.
>     >
>     > Sorry, I had to split the link in the corrected text to satisfy
>     the 72-character line length requirement in the corrected text.
>     >
>     > Instructions:
>     > -------------
>     > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>     > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>     > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>     > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>     >
>     > --------------------------------------
>     > RFC7948 (draft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations-05)
>     > --------------------------------------
>     > Title               : Internet Exchange BGP Route Server Operations
>     > Publication Date    : September 2016
>     > Author(s)           : N. Hilliard, E. Jasinska, R. Raszuk, N. Bakker
>     > Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>     > Source              : Global Routing Operations
>     > Area                : Operations and Management
>     > Stream              : IETF
>     > Verifying Party     : IESG
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > GROW mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>     >
>
>
>
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to