All, We consider errata to be errors at the time of publication. We would not consider an errata report valid if the URL in question were functioning at the time of publication.
>>> It's unlikely that the researchgate url will be persistent in the >>> longer term, at least any more than any other URL. >> >> Maybe Greg Skinner will file a new errata when that happens? :-) Note that errata reports can be updated. If this entry needs to be updated at some point, please contact the RFC Editor so we can provide access to the stream manager to review and update as needed. Please do not file a new erratum. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On May 26, 2018, at 9:22 AM, joel jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5/23/18 10:16 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:09 PM Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote: >> This errata report isn't wrong, but belongs to a bigger category of >> problems relating to how the IETF handles third party references in RFCs. >> >> It's unlikely that the researchgate url will be persistent in the longer >> term, at least any more than any other URL. >> >> I marked it as Hold for Document Update -- this seems to be the "best" way >> to annotate documents with things like this. >> > More generally the citation accurately describes the paper. At some point in > the future when we are long dead, it will still be a reference to the paper. > > Assuming that there is a method by which we can stably maintain references to > documents through URLs over the course of decades is misguided. > >> Thanks! >> W >> >> >> >> Nick >> >> RFC Errata System wrote: >> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7948, >> > "Internet Exchange BGP Route Server Operations". >> > >> > -------------------------------------- >> > You may review the report below and at: >> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5366 >> > >> > -------------------------------------- >> > Type: Technical >> > Reported by: Greg Skinner <[email protected]> >> > >> > Section: 6.2 >> > >> > Original Text >> > ------------- >> > [RS-ARCH] Govindan, R., Alaettinoglu, C., Varadhan, K., and D. >> > Estrin, "A Route Server Architecture for Inter-Domain >> > Routing", 1995, >> > <http://www.cs.usc.edu/assets/003/83191.pdf>. >> > >> > Corrected Text >> > -------------- >> > [RS-ARCH] Govindan, R., Alaettinoglu, C., Varadhan, K., and D. >> > Estrin, "A Route Server Architecture for Inter-Domain >> > Routing", 1995, >> > <https://www.researchgate.net/ >> > publication/ >> > 2297181_A_Route_Server_Architecture_for_Inter-Domain_Routing> >> > >> > Notes >> > ----- >> > The paper is no longer accessible from the www.cs.usc.edu site. A related >> > paper can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00008-7 by >> > those who are registered members or will pay for the paper. It would be >> > cited as: >> > [RS-ARCH] Govindan, R., Alaettinoglu, C., Varadhan, K., and D. >> > Estrin, "A Route Server Architecture for Inter-Domain >> > Routing", Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, Volume 30, >> > Issue 12, 13 July 1998, Pages 1157-1174, >> > <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00008-7>. >> > >> > Sorry, I had to split the link in the corrected text to satisfy the >> > 72-character line length requirement in the corrected text. >> > >> > Instructions: >> > ------------- >> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> > >> > -------------------------------------- >> > RFC7948 (draft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations-05) >> > -------------------------------------- >> > Title : Internet Exchange BGP Route Server Operations >> > Publication Date : September 2016 >> > Author(s) : N. Hilliard, E. Jasinska, R. Raszuk, N. Bakker >> > Category : INFORMATIONAL >> > Source : Global Routing Operations >> > Area : Operations and Management >> > Stream : IETF >> > Verifying Party : IESG >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > GROW mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >> > >> >> >> -- >> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in >> the first place. >> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing >> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of >> pants. >> ---maf >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
