On 05-May-19 06:03, Randy Bush wrote:
>> In my opinion, this document adds new requirements or at least new
>> considerations for implementations of RFC1997, I think that means it
>> updates RFC1997. I liked to see it have "Updates: 1997" metadata added and
>> appropriate statements in the Abstract and Intro. I think this requires and
>> justifies it being Standards Track.
That's a consistent approach too. One or the other, I don't care.
But not magenta, never!
Brian
>>
>> In both the Abstract and the 2nd paragraph of the Introduction,
>
> i have no dog in this fight. in general, i try to focus on the protein
> of the document, and leave grammar tweaks, what form of 2119 to use,
> etc. to the rfc editor, and weighty decisions such as this to the iesg.
>
> the bikeshed will, of course, be magenta comic sans :)
>
> randy
>
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
