On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:37 AM Job Snijders <[email protected]> wrote:
> Limiting the AS_PATH length - from an IETF RFC publication process in > context of providing operational guidance, probably shouldn’t be “limit the > path length to avoid vendor bugs”. > > Instead, the guidance perhaps should be “please report and fix bugs”, > right? :-) > Hi Job, "Don't poke the bear," is generally good advice. When we have sufficient reason to believe a particular behavior is error-prone, we should discourage that behavior. Regardless of whose "fault" it is. AND we should encourage folks to report and fix bugs. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
