From: GROW <[email protected]> on behalf of tom petch <[email protected]>
Sent: 21 March 2022 17:15
From: Benoit Claise <[email protected]>
Sent: 19 March 2022 17:27

Hi Tom,

Great feedback.

I would like to come back your NACM comment below.
We added "nacm:default-deny-all" to our action (in our temp version).

I have not been following the detailed history of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-13. And I
don't know whether this point was already discussed but I was surprised
to observe that this draft does not have "nacm:default-deny-all" for its
action. Bringing this issue here since I guess we deal with the same set
of people in GROW/IDR.

<tp>
Benoit

I think that this is one for IDR rather than GROW, that is it is just a 
question of getting the authors to include it,  not a question of good 
operational practice to include or not include it.  I don't think I have 
commented on bgp-model lately - there is much in it that I would rather were 
done differently such as how many separate modules and submodules there should 
be.  For the latter, I start at zero and do not count upwards.

<tp"
Benoit 

I was looking at babel-yang, currently with the RFC-Editor in MISSREF.

The Security Considerations flag the need to use NACM on such as RPC and 
'action' but the YANG module does not do so.  Rather it tacks a nacm:default 
deny-all onto some data leaves leaving the access to the  actions unlimited.

An interesting twist.

Tom Petch

Tom Petch
Regards, Benoit


On 3/11/2022 5:43 PM, tom petch wrote:
> From: GROW <[email protected]> on behalf of Camilo Cardona 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: 07 March 2022 10:06
> Hi Grow,
>
> We just submitted a new draft proposing a yang module for configuring and 
> managing BMP on a device.
>
> It would be nice to get some comments, observations, etc.
>
> <tp>
>
> prefix bmp seems more than adequate to me - ietf in the name but not in the 
> prefix
>
> import must have a reference and the reference must be Normative References 
> for the I-D
>
> YANG must be plain text - I am always suspicious of [] as in
>          "[RFC-to-be]: BMP YANG Module";
>
> an enum with only one value  could do with an explanation
> looking at how it is used, I do not understand it
>
> your ip type include the zone - is this intended?
>
>         leaf destination-port {
>           type inet:ip-address;
> looks like an oxymoron
>
> statistics interval has no units
>
> statistics commonly have a discontinuity leaf
>
> unit32 may be small for counters
>
> actions commonly have a NACM default deny-all
>
> '   BGP data is sensible for security considerations.'
>   looks a bit odd
>
> IANA considerations are incomplete - you must register the prefix
>
> YANG needs references, BGP. BMP!. etc
>
> This  e-mail comes from two addresses neither of which are the address in the 
> I-D; I wonder if they will bounce:-(
>
>
> Have a 'nice' day,
>
> Tom Petch
>
> Grow Chairs, will it be possible to get a 5 minute slot in the next session 
> to give an overview of this module?
>
> Thanks,
> Camilo Cardona
>
>
>
>> On 7/3/22, 10:51, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     A new version of I-D, draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang-01.txt
>>     has been successfully submitted by Camilo Cardona and posted to the
>>     IETF repository.
>>
>>     Name:              draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang
>>     Revision:  01
>>     Title:             BMP YANG Module
>>     Document date:     2022-03-07
>>     Group:             Individual Submission
>>     Pages:             14
>>     URL:            
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang-01.txt
>>     Status:         
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang/
>>     Htmlized:       
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang
>>     Diff:           
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang-01
>>
>>     Abstract:
>>        This document proposes a YANG module for BMP (BGP Monitoring
>>        Protocol) configuration and monitoring.  A complementary RPC triggers
>>        a refresh of the session of a BMP station.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to