> Ultimately it is up to network operators whether they deploy routing > policy that reject ASPA-Invalid routes.
8481 ยง5 > What's important here is to mark routes that contain an AS_SET in the > AS_PATH as 'Invalid' when performing ASPA verification. agree >> If the WG agrees to change normalative language from 'SHOULD' to >> 'MUST', the ASPA document will follow. > I don't see that dependency; however there seems to be good consensus > to remove the "Unverifiable" state from the Internet-Draft and instead > mark routes as "Invalid" if an AS_SET is encountered anywhere in the > AS_PATH. i am not sure i follow; i am not as sure as i should be of your words; i.e. which draft. i suggest we unequivocally stomp out as-sets wherever. while i am sure corner-case aficionados can dos me with obscure needs in the pacific islands; procmail and the rising sea levels will take care of it. randy _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
