> On Sep 21, 2022, at 1:52 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Paolo, > > A-la: there is multiple updates related to a certain NLRI by when a BMP > message is to be sent out, let's state-compress (ie. not send out) those > that were already obsoleted by a subsequent update. > > But this will hide BGP churn for a given NET to be detectable by BMP > receiver. Is this a good thing ? I am not sure. It is a loss of information > to me. State compression for route-monitoring messages in BMP is common. If you wanted perfect state, you would use route-mirroring mode, if the implementation supported it. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Tim Evens (tievens)
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Tim Evens (tievens)
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Maximilian Wilhelm
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Tim Evens (tievens)
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Tim Evens (tievens)
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Henk Smit
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Robert Raszuk
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Robert Raszuk
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Robert Raszuk
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Paolo Lucente
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Tim Evens (tievens)
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Robert Raszuk
- Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR Zhuangshunwan
