> On Sep 21, 2022, at 1:52 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paolo,
>  
> A-la: there is multiple updates related to a certain NLRI by when a BMP 
> message is to be sent out, let's state-compress (ie. not send out) those 
> that were already obsoleted by a subsequent update.
> 
> But this will hide BGP churn for a given NET to be detectable by BMP 
> receiver. Is this a good thing ? I am not sure. It is a loss of information 
> to me. 

State compression for route-monitoring messages in BMP is common.

If you wanted perfect state, you would use route-mirroring mode, if the 
implementation supported it.

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to