Ooof.

Yes, this seems to be correct (but I wouldn't mind someone else confirming)
— what I don't know is how we get the IANA registry updated — can an errata
do this (with a note to the IANA), or does it need a new document ? I'll
email the IANA and ask…

W




On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 8:32 AM, RFC Errata System <
[email protected]> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7854,
> "BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7194
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Ahmed Elhassany <[email protected]>
>
> Section: 10.8
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Information type values 0 through 32767 MUST be assigned using the
> "Standards Action" policy, and values 32768 through 65530 using the
> "Specification Required" policy, defined in [RFC5226]. Values 65531
> through 65534 are Experimental, and values 0 and 65535 are Reserved.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Information type values 0 through 127 MUST be assigned using the
> "Standards Action" policy, and values 128 through 250 using the
> "Specification Required" policy, defined in [RFC5226]. Values 251 through
> 254 are Experimental, and values 0 and 255 are Reserved.
>
> Notes
> -----
> In Section 4.9 Peer Down Notification. The "Reason" field is defined as
> one octet, while the IANA consideration section is defining values as
> 2-octets range. This errata suggests updating the IANA registry, instead of
> the size of the "Reason" field in the Peer Down Notification message to
> avoid breaking existing implementations that use one-octet reason.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
> decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status
> and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7854 (draft-ietf-grow-bmp-17)
> --------------------------------------
> Title : BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Publication Date : June 2016
> Author(s) : J. Scudder, Ed., R. Fernando, S. Stuart Category : PROPOSED
> STANDARD
> Source : Global Routing Operations
> Area : Operations and Management
> Stream : IETF
> Verifying Party : IESG
>
>
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to