Sorry about that. 

The erratum is legit, should be verified IMO. 

—John

> On Oct 30, 2022, at 4:32 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7854,
> "BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7194__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!AqnlC3TArN6GcXDLLA_xxBPotnjq95ygKIRNZvc6RVfL7k2bkLuK13B9ThqIG_4sUeUd1zQDH5ZhsEc-u4_0kQ$
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Ahmed Elhassany <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 10.8
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   Information type values 0 through 32767 MUST be assigned using the
>   "Standards Action" policy, and values 32768 through 65530 using the
>   "Specification Required" policy, defined in [RFC5226].  Values 65531
>   through 65534 are Experimental, and values 0 and 65535 are Reserved.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   Information type values 0 through 127 MUST be assigned using the
>   "Standards Action" policy, and values 128 through 250 using the
>   "Specification Required" policy, defined in [RFC5226].  Values 251
>   through 254 are Experimental, and values 0 and 255 are Reserved.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> In Section 4.9 Peer Down Notification. The "Reason" field is defined as one 
> octet, while the IANA consideration section is defining values as 2-octets 
> range. This errata suggests updating the IANA registry, instead of the size 
> of the "Reason" field in the Peer Down Notification message to avoid breaking 
> existing implementations that use one-octet reason.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7854 (draft-ietf-grow-bmp-17)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)
> Publication Date    : June 2016
> Author(s)           : J. Scudder, Ed., R. Fernando, S. Stuart
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Global Routing Operations
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to