Thanks John. Waiting to hear other opinions, if any. -- Regards, Dhananjay From: John Scudder <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 29 November 2023 at 1:00 AM To: Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki) <[email protected]> Cc: Rex Fernando (rex) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Warren Kumari <[email protected]>, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7854 (7703) This seems right. Unless anyone else sees a problem with it, I’d say verify the erratum.
—John > On Nov 16, 2023, at 5:24 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7854, > "BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7703__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HnufjFK0wFIcNIN5-34vQMqmG8yvUaw6eoTAdyMYnTxkogc1LdAbUJOb_Guugi2ASer_uq6Aaaowjtulif7zJQ$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7703__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HnufjFK0wFIcNIN5-34vQMqmG8yvUaw6eoTAdyMYnTxkogc1LdAbUJOb_Guugi2ASer_uq6Aaaowjtulif7zJQ$> > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Dhananjay S. Patki <[email protected]> > > Section: 4.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > * The L flag, if set to 1, indicates that the message reflects > the post-policy Adj-RIB-In (i.e., its path attributes reflect > the application of inbound policy). It is set to 0 if the > message reflects the pre-policy Adj-RIB-In. Locally sourced > routes also carry an L flag of 1. See Section 5 for further > detail. This flag has no significance when used with route > mirroring messages (Section 4.7). > > Corrected Text > -------------- > * The L flag, if set to 1, indicates that the message reflects > the post-policy Adj-RIB-In (i.e., its path attributes reflect > the application of inbound policy). It is set to 0 if the > message reflects the pre-policy Adj-RIB-In. Locally sourced > routes also carry an L flag of 1. See Section 5 for further > detail. This flag has significance only when used with Route > Monitoring messages. > > Notes > ----- > The L flag is used to indicate whether the route monitoring update reflects > Adj-RIB-In pre-policy or post-policy (RFC 7854), or Adj-RIB-Out pre-policy or > post-policy (RFC 8671). It does not apply to any message other than the Route > Monitoring message. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7854 (draft-ietf-grow-bmp-17) > -------------------------------------- > Title : BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) > Publication Date : June 2016 > Author(s) : J. Scudder, Ed., R. Fernando, S. Stuart > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Global Routing Operations > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
