Thanks for having filed this errata; this also seems right to me.
Paolo
On 30/11/23 18:06, Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki) wrote:
Thanks John. Waiting to hear other opinions, if any.
--
Regards,
Dhananjay
*From: *John Scudder <[email protected]>
*Date: *Wednesday, 29 November 2023 at 1:00 AM
*To: *Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki) <[email protected]>
*Cc: *Rex Fernando (rex) <[email protected]>, [email protected]
<[email protected]>, Warren Kumari <[email protected]>, Rob Wilton
(rwilton) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>,
[email protected] <[email protected]>,
[email protected] <[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7854 (7703)
This seems right. Unless anyone else sees a problem with it, I’d say
verify the erratum.
—John
On Nov 16, 2023, at 5:24 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7854,
"BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7703__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HnufjFK0wFIcNIN5-34vQMqmG8yvUaw6eoTAdyMYnTxkogc1LdAbUJOb_Guugi2ASer_uq6Aaaowjtulif7zJQ$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7703__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HnufjFK0wFIcNIN5-34vQMqmG8yvUaw6eoTAdyMYnTxkogc1LdAbUJOb_Guugi2ASer_uq6Aaaowjtulif7zJQ$>
--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Dhananjay S. Patki <[email protected]>
Section: 4.2
Original Text
-------------
* The L flag, if set to 1, indicates that the message reflects
the post-policy Adj-RIB-In (i.e., its path attributes reflect
the application of inbound policy). It is set to 0 if the
message reflects the pre-policy Adj-RIB-In. Locally sourced
routes also carry an L flag of 1. See Section 5 for further
detail. This flag has no significance when used with route
mirroring messages (Section 4.7).
Corrected Text
--------------
* The L flag, if set to 1, indicates that the message reflects
the post-policy Adj-RIB-In (i.e., its path attributes reflect
the application of inbound policy). It is set to 0 if the
message reflects the pre-policy Adj-RIB-In. Locally sourced
routes also carry an L flag of 1. See Section 5 for further
detail. This flag has significance only when used with Route
Monitoring messages.
Notes
-----
The L flag is used to indicate whether the route monitoring update reflects
Adj-RIB-In pre-policy or post-policy (RFC 7854), or Adj-RIB-Out pre-policy or
post-policy (RFC 8671). It does not apply to any message other than the Route
Monitoring message.
Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC7854 (draft-ietf-grow-bmp-17)
--------------------------------------
Title : BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)
Publication Date : June 2016
Author(s) : J. Scudder, Ed., R. Fernando, S. Stuart
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Global Routing Operations
Area : Operations and Management
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
