On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 08:19:42PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > Moreover, we know at least another IXP that dropped support for > Extended Communities 2 years ago with big success, thus adopting > such a practice from other fellow IXPs shouldn’t be of > an issue as long as support for Large Communities is in place. > > So, this includes things like RPKI validation signaled by RFC 8097 done by > the IXP RS?
The RFC 8097 communities are non-transitive, right? It would seem strange to ingest those via an EBGP session from the Route Server? Additionally, I think there are issues with signaling RPKI validation states via EBGP, it can cause needless churn. We tried to capture that here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
