[moving this to a new thread as it's unrelated to
draft-ietf-grow-ixp-ext-comms]
Robert Raszuk wrote on 07/06/2024 22:29:
True. But we there is clear opportunity to define those scoped for IXP
use case.
This is BCP so IMO good place to encourage using common encoding for
most common needs.
I'm not convinced this is a good plan. The semantics of the existing
WKCs have turned out to be unexpectedly complex in production
environments, and the semantics for candidate route server WKCs that
have been discussed by RS operators are a good deal more so. There have
been proposals in the past about this, but none have ended up with
rigorous definitions or sample code.
Nick
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
