Moin, > Although in the face of it I agree that reclassifying as historic > sounds sensible, even small changes to status can have unexpected > consequences elsewhere in the policy apparatus.
For sure. This is a bit of the problem with the grown policy apparatus, and part of why I'd advocate for fixing such inconsistencies. > I suggest that before this working group rolls its sleeves up on > anything, the idea should at minimum take a trip through the IAB who > can exercise its various liaisons to convene a wider conversation > that includes other organisations. The landscape is wider than just > this mailing list. Well, we have to get started somewhere, and pushing this to the IAB might be an option. Then again, the question is how deep the IAB is in these policy implications in comparison to this group. > It the known problem is just one conversation in one working group at > one RIR, the most expedient approach might just be to take the right > people to the bar in Lisbon and talk this over. I would say that it is not really one discussion in one RIR. It just has come up a couple of times (and specifically in this discussion for obvious reasons) in that RIR; And I'd argue that the amount of funny side-effects the document can have in the future is also non-zero. With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] Pronouns: he/him/his _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
