Hi Tobias, On 1 Apr 2025, at 10:17, Tobias Fiebig <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, the core reason would be that i am currently participating in a > discussion in an RIR's address policy WG where some see BCP6 more like > a BCP and less like a documentation of historic consensus. > > So, in essence: > - I agree with your point w.r.t. "RFC 1930 is documentation of > historical consensus" > - I somewhat think that it could be useful to make that explicit I can see how that might be useful, but as you mentioned there also examples (e.g. in other RIRs) where explicit actions relating to RFC 1930 the document were apparently not necessary. What you describe sounds more like a job for the RIPE wg than for the grow wg :-) Joe _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
