On May 18, 2010, at 21:22:20, Chris Forsythe wrote: > This overrides one of our main goals, giving users the control. I'm ok with a > white list, but the end user must have control.
I think the rules are different in a managed environment. It's not the user's computer, it's (effectively) the admin's, so it's the admin who should have control. The user needs to have *some* control, such as the ability to disable certain notifications and to customize their display to their taste, but when there is an admin, the admin should have the power to set whatever limits they see fit, including an exclusive list of applications allowed to post Growl notifications. Allowing the user to override such a list undermines that power. So, I think Growl should simply obey the whitelist, at least when it is enforced, and display (one way or another) that there is one. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
