On Jul 4, 2010, at 23:25:24, Adrian Petrescu wrote: > I understand sometimes it can be desirable but can we at least have an option > in the workflow to silently treat the action as a no-op if Growl is off?
Why an option? Normal behavior is for Growl notifications to fail silently when Growl isn't running. I see no reason why an Automator workflow's notifications should be any different. > Would you guys take a patch for this? Yes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
