Cool :) Well, here's the patch: http://apetresc-share.s3.amazonaws.com/automator_silent_fail.patch
It's my first time submitting a patch to Growl and I couldn't find any guidelines so I hope it's pretty straightforward. Let me know if there's any way I can improve (future) submissions. Cheers, Adrian On Jul 5, 2:42 am, Peter Hosey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 4, 2010, at 23:25:24, Adrian Petrescu wrote: > > > I understand sometimes it can be desirable but can we at least have an > > option in the workflow to silently treat the action as a no-op if Growl is > > off? > > Why an option? Normal behavior is for Growl notifications to fail silently > when Growl isn't running. I see no reason why an Automator workflow's > notifications should be any different. > > > Would you guys take a patch for this? > > Yes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
