On Mar 2, 2011, at 09:46:14, Konstantinos wrote: > This, I believe, is in accordance with the Growl philosophy, …
Yes. > … but my tool probably should be categorised more like "HardwareGrowler", as > it would be nice if the user installed Growl already. No, because your application has an alternative. If all it could do was to provide Growl notifications for the calendar alarms, then it would be like HardwareGrowler, but since it has the option to use alert boxes, it is not, so it should not show an alert if Growl is not installed. If Growl is not installed, you should simply use alert boxes for alarms unconditionally. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
