On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:55:17PM -0700, Peter Hosey wrote: > On Apr 26, 2011, at 16:56:39, Scott Goldman wrote: > > And from a personal usage standpoint I strongly believe that many users > > would find this option exceedingly useful. > > I don't know about that, but you're not the first person to request this, so > we know at least that there are many users who want it. > > http://code.google.com/p/growl/issues/detail?id=193
I'm unable to "sign in" to contribute on that site, but if my login worked I would star the item and make the following point: Analyzing my use of sticky notifications, I realize that each and every time I come back to one on my screen, I'm then checking other sources of info for when the notification was posted. This is in fact why I have not upgraded past Growl 1.2. One of my sources of "when did that notification get posted" information is the logs viewed via Console.app. The extremely chatty debug info about display rect calculation logged by Growl 1.2.1 caused me to back off to 1.2 in order to have the necessary timing info still in the log files by the time I checked for it. At the time, I believe I suggested operational vs. debug logging be done. Optional timestamps including dates in the sticky notifications would make secondary checks for when the event happened less necessary for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
