It would be more concise, but applications do not need to send their application icon, they can send an image (album artwork, im buddy icon, etc etc) so you'd have a jumble of app name and then no app name.
I think it's better to have it. -- Chris Forsythe On Monday, October 10, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Mvcoile wrote: > Hi, > > Although I'm not a fan of complex drawings/images in menus, I think > the history section of the menubar-item can handle it. Just the > summary is a little to sparse, information wise. > > Actually, the view used in the rollback/HUD is about what I mean. If > the app icon is displayed, then the app name doesn't need to be > mentioned (to be more concise). > > Ps. great release! > > Kind regards, > Maarten > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Growl Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
