Hi David,

Is grpclb available now? since the PR that adds support for the c-ares DNS 
resolver has being merged. But the calls to grpc_lb_addresses_set_address 
still always set is_balancer=false in dns_resolver_ares.c, that confused me.

在 2017年5月31日星期三 UTC+8上午8:29:01,David Garcia Quintas写道:
>
> Hi Tudor,
>
> Apologies for the late response. It's timely that the PR that adds support 
> for the c-ares DNS resolver (https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/11237) is 
> very close to being merged. This is the piece that's missing for making 
> grpclb work in open source. In particular:
>
>    - Have a look at this document 
>    <https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A5-grpclb-in-dns.md>. It 
>    goes over the DNS configuration changes needed to control which addresses 
>    are marked as balancers. It's currently a "proposal", to be promoted to a 
>    doc shortly. It can be taken quite authoritatively, it's what 
>    https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/11237 is implementing for balancer 
>    discovery.
>    - Wait for https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/11237 to be merged, or 
>    patch it in a local repo.
>    - Write a regular gRPC server (in any language) implementing the load 
>    balancer protocol 
>    
> <https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/proto/grpc/lb/v1/load_balancer.proto>.
>  
>    This is the server to be marked in your DNS records as a balancer (as 
>    described in the aforementioned document 
>    <https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A5-grpclb-in-dns.md>), 
>    with which the client's grpclb will talk to to obtain the list of backend 
>    addresses (what's called server_lists 
>    
> <https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/proto/grpc/lb/v1/load_balancer.proto#L120>).
>  
>    It's up to you to make the logic inside this balancer as simple or as 
>    complex as you want.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions, I'll be more prompt to get back to 
> you this time around :)
> David.
>
> On Tuesday, 18 April 2017 08:46:46 UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> What's the status of load balancing (
>> https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/doc/load-balancing.md) in C++?
>>
>> It seems that the "grpclb" implementation exists in core, but there's no 
>> way to obtain addresses with is_balancer=true (the DNS resolvers always 
>> assume that resolved addresses are regular backend addresses as opposed to 
>> balancer addresses; the calls to grpc_lb_addresses_set_address always set 
>> is_balancer=false).
>>
>> Right now, I'm planning to multiplex on my side onto a pool of channels 
>> (I'm using Kubernetes iptables forwarding, which looks like a L4 balancer 
>> from the client side -- all nodes are hidden behind the same IP address), 
>> but I'd be willing to switch to grpclb when it becomes available.
>>
>> Also, are there any plans to provide grpclb servers for common use cases 
>> (balancing to one Kubernetes service would be a very useful one, and would 
>> probably get a lot of usage).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Tudor.
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"grpc.io" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/e769124d-fded-4bac-8dbc-cf4ce153d9f5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to