I think you must be looking at code that does not include that PR.  With
that PR, there are no calls to grpc_lb_addresses_set_address() in
dns_resolver_ares.c; those calls have been moved to grpc_ares_wrapper.c,
and the is_balancer parameter is set to true for balancer addresses:

https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/resolver/dns/c_ares/grpc_ares_wrapper.c#L176

Hope this helps.

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:44 AM, 谭锦彪 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Is grpclb available now? since the PR that adds support for the c-ares DNS
> resolver has being merged. But the calls to grpc_lb_addresses_set_address
> still always set is_balancer=false in dns_resolver_ares.c, that confused me.
>
> 在 2017年5月31日星期三 UTC+8上午8:29:01,David Garcia Quintas写道:
>>
>> Hi Tudor,
>>
>> Apologies for the late response. It's timely that the PR that adds
>> support for the c-ares DNS resolver (https://github.com/grpc/grpc/
>> pull/11237) is very close to being merged. This is the piece that's
>> missing for making grpclb work in open source. In particular:
>>
>>    - Have a look at this document
>>    <https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A5-grpclb-in-dns.md>.
>>    It goes over the DNS configuration changes needed to control which
>>    addresses are marked as balancers. It's currently a "proposal", to be
>>    promoted to a doc shortly. It can be taken quite authoritatively, it's 
>> what
>>    https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/11237
>>    <https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/11237> is implementing for
>>    balancer discovery.
>>    - Wait for https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/11237 to be merged, or
>>    patch it in a local repo.
>>    - Write a regular gRPC server (in any language) implementing the load
>>    balancer protocol
>>    
>> <https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/proto/grpc/lb/v1/load_balancer.proto>.
>>    This is the server to be marked in your DNS records as a balancer (as
>>    described in the aforementioned document
>>    <https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A5-grpclb-in-dns.md>),
>>    with which the client's grpclb will talk to to obtain the list of backend
>>    addresses (what's called server_lists
>>    
>> <https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/proto/grpc/lb/v1/load_balancer.proto#L120>).
>>    It's up to you to make the logic inside this balancer as simple or as
>>    complex as you want.
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions, I'll be more prompt to get back to
>> you this time around :)
>> David.
>>
>> On Tuesday, 18 April 2017 08:46:46 UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> What's the status of load balancing (https://github.com/grpc/grpc/
>>> blob/master/doc/load-balancing.md) in C++?
>>>
>>> It seems that the "grpclb" implementation exists in core, but there's no
>>> way to obtain addresses with is_balancer=true (the DNS resolvers always
>>> assume that resolved addresses are regular backend addresses as opposed to
>>> balancer addresses; the calls to grpc_lb_addresses_set_address always set
>>> is_balancer=false).
>>>
>>> Right now, I'm planning to multiplex on my side onto a pool of channels
>>> (I'm using Kubernetes iptables forwarding, which looks like a L4 balancer
>>> from the client side -- all nodes are hidden behind the same IP address),
>>> but I'd be willing to switch to grpclb when it becomes available.
>>>
>>> Also, are there any plans to provide grpclb servers for common use cases
>>> (balancing to one Kubernetes service would be a very useful one, and would
>>> probably get a lot of usage).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Tudor.
>>>
>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "
> grpc.io" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/grpc-io/e769124d-fded-4bac-8dbc-cf4ce153d9f5%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/e769124d-fded-4bac-8dbc-cf4ce153d9f5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Mark D. Roth <[email protected]>
Software Engineer
Google, Inc.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"grpc.io" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/CAJgPXp4mBbDm%2BO8xCk1Ym1pXydBoc734tD4ROoqY03f6PggdVQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to