I’m pretty sure what you are asking breaks the security of using SSL... the certificates are issued to a domain for that reason, otherwise any valid certificate would be acceptable to the caller.
> On Nov 19, 2018, at 12:33 PM, solomon lifshits <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since the function SetSslTargetNameOverride is marked as test only, I am > asking whether there is any "legal" alternative to connect to a server with > specific IP address, while using a host name for server name indication? Any > possibility for forced resolution of a hostname? If a tls certificate is > issued for a hostname, but an rpc call has to be done on specific machine? > Any ideas? Thanks in advance! > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "grpc.io" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/c5c3c642-1317-41fe-afd4-d7ff8c117585%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/FEBE5313-5115-4208-A6B8-F1B58A987020%40earthlink.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
