C++, the latest 1.44.0 release. 

> 16. 3. 2022 v 21:32, Mark D. Roth <[email protected]>:
> 
> 
> It is valid behavior, but I agree that it's a little sub-optimal for the 
> client to send two messages when it reestablishes the stream.  What language 
> are you using gRPC in?
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:19 PM František Bořánek <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It makes sense.
>> 
>> However, in this case, the initial connection was already made and this 
>> tcpdump samples recovering of ADS stream. And as you write:
>> 
>> > Note that once your application receives all 7 resources from the xDS 
>> > server, if the ADS stream is broken and the client reestablishes it at 
>> > that point, it should immediately subscribe to all 7 resources in the 
>> > initial message on the new stream.
>> 
>> It behaves as I described. First 1 resource and then 7 resources. Note that 
>> the messages have version_info. Brand new channels don't have version_info.
>> 
>> But as you pointed, the channels can be created anytime, thus it's valid 
>> bahaviur.
>> 
>> Thanks for replying.
>> 
>> F.
>> 
>>> 16. 3. 2022 v 19:49, Mark D. Roth <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> The gRPC client does not know a priori what set of resource names are 
>>> available on the xDS server, and even if it did, it would not request all 
>>> of them proactively, because it may not actually need all of them.  
>>> Instead, each time a gRPC channel is created with an "xds:" target URI, 
>>> that tells gRPC which LDS resource to request, and it requests the 
>>> resources as they are needed.  Because the application can create new 
>>> channels at any time, the set of resources requested on the ADS stream can 
>>> change at any time.
>>> 
>>> If your application immediately creates 7 channels when it starts up, then 
>>> the pattern you're seeing is expected.  When the first channel (presumably 
>>> for "xds:server-1") starts connecting, it will immediately subscribe to the 
>>> corresponding LDS resource ("server-1").  While it's waiting for that 
>>> message to be sent, it notices that the other 6 channels have started up, 
>>> so it realizes that it has to subscribe to the other 6 resources.  By the 
>>> time the initial message is sent and it's able to send a second message, it 
>>> knows about all 7 subscriptions, so the second message contains all 7 of 
>>> them.
>>> 
>>> Note that once your application receives all 7 resources from the xDS 
>>> server, if the ADS stream is broken and the client reestablishes it at that 
>>> point, it should immediately subscribe to all 7 resources in the initial 
>>> message on the new stream.  That is because it already knows about all of 
>>> the subscriptions at the point at which it sends the initial message on the 
>>> new stream.
>>> 
>>> This communication is fully legal and should work fine with any 
>>> xDS-compliant server.  As described in this section of the xDS spec, the 
>>> intent of the version field in the DiscoveryRequest is to provide the 
>>> server with a way to know when it sends a version that the client considers 
>>> invalid.  But if the client sends a second DiscoveryRequest with the same 
>>> version and a different list of resource names, that indicates that it is 
>>> changing what resources it is subscribing to, and the server cannot ignore 
>>> that just because the version is the same as one it has previously seen.
>>> 
>>> I hope this information is helpful.
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 5:41 AM František Bořánek <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I don't know if such behaviour is a bug.
>>>> 
>>>> I have server communicates with 7 services configured via XDS and after 
>>>> the xds-client got GO AWAY packet from XDS server 6 channels cannot 
>>>> connect due to error and only one is ok. I did a tcpdump to see a chat 
>>>> between our implementation of XDS and C++gRPC and cannot deside if C++gRPC 
>>>> behave correct.
>>>> 
>>>> It relates to 
>>>> https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A27-xds-global-load-balancing.md#initial-request-on-the-ads-stream
>>>>  >      The first request on the ADS stream will include a Node message 
>>>> that identifies the client. As mentioned above, most of the fields for the 
>>>> Node message will be read from the bootstrap file.
>>>> 
>>>> I would expect that after reconnect the xds client sends to ADS stream 4 
>>>> requests (LDS, CDS, EDS, RDS) however it sends 5 requests (LDS, LDS, CDS, 
>>>> EDS, RDS). On our side of xds server we are confused by these 2 LDS 
>>>> requests.
>>>> 
>>>> 1.
>>>> (PROTOBUF) envoy.api.v2.DiscoveryRequest
>>>> {
>>>>   version_info: "ba0255a2-07b6-45ed-83b4-dad0cbf96b1f"
>>>>   node: {
>>>>     cluster: "default-cluster"
>>>>     user_agent_name: "gRPC C-core linux"
>>>>     user_agent_version: "C-core 22.0.0"
>>>>     client_features: "envoy.lb.does_not_support_overprovisioning"
>>>>     build_version: "gRPC C-core linux 22.0.0"
>>>>   }
>>>>   resource_names: "server-1"
>>>>   type_url: "type.googleapis.com/envoy.api.v2.Listener"
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> 2.
>>>> (PROTOBUF) envoy.api.v2.DiscoveryRequest
>>>> {
>>>>   version_info: "ba0255a2-07b6-45ed-83b4-dad0cbf96b1f"
>>>>   resource_names: "server-1"
>>>>   resource_names: "server-2"
>>>>   resource_names: "server-3"
>>>>   resource_names: "server-4"
>>>>   resource_names: "server-5"
>>>>   resource_names: "server-6"
>>>>   resource_names: "server-7"
>>>>   type_url: "type.googleapis.com/envoy.api.v2.Listener"
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> - Shouldn't it be only one LDS request?
>>>> - Shouldn't it the initial request contains all configured resources?
>>>> 
>>>> Root of our problem is that we responds only on first request since it 
>>>> have the same version. I know how to fix it on our end, but it is 
>>>> behaviour of gRPC xds-client correct?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "grpc.io" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/e2a5befd-5943-4b40-afc4-4864938b9b88n%40googlegroups.com.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Mark D. Roth <[email protected]>
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Google, Inc.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark D. Roth <[email protected]>
> Software Engineer
> Google, Inc.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"grpc.io" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/DA8F9511-2924-41B9-A23A-E7026751747D%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to