Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:21:59AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: >> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:36:41AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Maybe it's time we move out those generic files under powerpc >> >> > directory. I >> >> > propose moving the following: >> >> > >> >> > kern/powerpc/ieee1275/init.c >> >> > kern/powerpc/ieee1275/cmain.c >> >> > kern/powerpc/ieee1275/openfw.c >> >> > loader/powerpc/ieee1275/multiboot2.c >> >> >> >> Move it where? >> > >> > To s,powerpc/,,g >> >> Fine for me... >> >> It would be nice if we could switch to SVN or so soon. SVN is >> available on savannah and works almost the same as CVS. I know there >> are better systems to work with, but this is a no brainer I hope. >> Moving files is no fun with CVS :-( > > I thought SVN wasn't (properly) supported by Savannah.
I am not sure: http://savannah.gnu.org/svn/?group=phpgroupware They seem to use it... >> What was the outcome of the previous discussions on this? All these >> threads explode with mails on which system is the best, because of >> that I ignore the thread and nothing happens... :-) > > Some people wanted GIT, and Okuji objected, following a long, boring > discussion > about the advantages and disadvantages of GIT. Yes, other people want bzr, others want bzr, etc, etc. I do not care. This way we never switch, which is even worse. > I personaly think we should just ditch CVS, because CVS has these annoying > limitations, but not try to do something fancy. SVN is the logical > evolution of CVS, so why not just do that. That's exactly what I was thinking ;-). I was bothered by the limitation. And that we cannot discuss changing to svn first :-) So what now? > We can always switch to GIT in the future if/when everybody agrees. Right! -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
