On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 12:25 +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > I personaly think we should just ditch CVS, because CVS has these annoying > > limitations, but not try to do something fancy. SVN is the logical > > evolution of CVS, so why not just do that. > > GNU Arch is supported already: > https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/GNUArch > > It seems subversion is not officially supported yet: > https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhenSvN
Sorry for being late to the discussion. Subversion is clearly superior to CVS, but the difference between CVS and Subversion in terms of project organization is insignificant, at least for a project like GRUB. Considering that Subversion is not supported by Savannah, I think it's not worth it to move the repository to another site just to use Subversion. A commit that moves a file from one place to another will be understood by the converters as a move. As for git, I made a mirror at git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git that is updated by a cron job every 2 hours. I make all my patches in my local git repository. git can import from Subversion too. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
