Hi, On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our main repository is in Subversion, so whoever applies the patch > should use "svn move" to keep the contiguous file history. Unlike git, > which trusts the contents in the first place, Subversion is more > sensitive to whatever users are telling it.
I use git-mv to move files, which is the equivalence of "svn move". But when I use git-diff to generate the patch, it looks as if files are truncated. I can use git-diff -M to create a patch that shows the renames, but it's not usable by patch. > > IMHO that even worse. Using a trademarked name like "linux" to run the > trademarked software could be justified. But using a trademarked name > to replace or emulate the original software is asking for a big trouble. > > Admittedly, I'm not a lawyer, but some people are, and it's better not > to attract their attention. In fact, it doesn't replace bootcamp, it calls the service provided by bootcamp. But anyway, it's not a big deal, I can just keep the name appleloader. BTW, any comment about the other changes ? -- Bean _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
