Hi, On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > IMHO that even worse. Using a trademarked name like "linux" to run the >> > trademarked software could be justified. But using a trademarked name >> > to replace or emulate the original software is asking for a big trouble. >> > >> > Admittedly, I'm not a lawyer, but some people are, and it's better not >> > to attract their attention. >> >> In fact, it doesn't replace bootcamp, it calls the service provided by >> bootcamp. But anyway, it's not a big deal, I can just keep the name >> appleloader. > > Fine.
I'm sorry, do you mean it's fine to use bootcamp, or keep the name appleloader ? > >> BTW, any comment about the other changes ? > > Why do we need "crc"? If there are chances that it will be used for > security, we should be using SHA-1. crc is useful in many place. For example, png, jffs2, etc. -- Bean _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
