# grid-cert-diagnostic , Result is
Checking Environment Variables
==============================
Checking if X509_CERT_DIR is set... /etc/grid-security/certificates
Checking if X509_USER_CERT is set... /etc/grid-security/containercert.pem
Checking if X509_USER_KEY is set... /etc/grid-security/containerkey.pem
Checking if X509_USER_PROXY is set... no

Checking Security Directories
=======================
Determining trusted cert path... /etc/grid-security/certificates
Checking for cog.properties... not found

Checking trusted certificates...
================================
Getting trusted certificate list...
Checking CA file /etc/grid-security/certificates/e092b1b7.0... ok
Verifying certificate chain for "/etc/grid-security/certificates/e092b1b7.0"... 
ok


-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Bacon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 7/21/2008 4:20 PM
To: Kashif Mohammad
Cc: Omer Jilani; [email protected]
Subject: Re: grid-proxy-init -debug -verify problem in gt4.2.0
 
Try the grid-cert-diagnostics script from 4.2.0 and send us the results.

Thanks,

Charles

On Jul 19, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Kashif Mohammad wrote:

>
> Yes, I have double checked it, and signing policy file is exactly  
> same in both machine.
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Bacon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 7/18/2008 6:36 PM
> To: Kashif Mohammad
> Cc: Omer Jilani; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: grid-proxy-init -debug -verify problem in gt4.2.0
>
> It sounds like the problem is in the signing policy.  Can you verify
> that the signing policy is the same on the two different machines?
>
> One difference between 4.0 and 4.2 will be the default type of proxy
> created.  4.0 had a nonstandard OID in one location, while 4.2 is
> fully RFC compliant by default.  You can tell them apart with grid-
> proxy-info.  The 4.0 style is:
> type     : Proxy draft (pre-RFC) compliant impersonation proxy
>
> The 4.2 style is:
> type     : RFC 3820 compliant impersonation proxy
>
> But that should not affect the behavior of the proxy with respect to
> verification.  I just mention it for completeness.
>
>
> Charles
>
> On Jul 18, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Kashif Mohammad wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All
>> We are doing a small experiment in basic level interoperability
>> between glite and globus. We are using vmware virtual machine and
>> glite training tool gridseed. In Gridseed we can initiate all the
>> components of glite and there is CA in the setup which provides Host
>> Certificate and User Certificate and also creates signing policy
>> files etc.
>> I installed gt4.0.0 on a different virtual machine and integrated it
>> with gridseed and got the certificate from gridseed and ran grid-
>> proxy-init -debug -verify and proxy was created without any error.
>>
>> Then I installed gt4.2.0 on a different virtual machine and repeat
>> the same procedure but this time I got this error when I ran grid-
>> proxy-init -debug -verfify
>> ERROR: could not verify the authenticity of the user credential to
>> generate a proxy from grid-ptoxy-init.c:1013: globus_credential:
>> Error verifying credential: Failed to verify the credential.
>> globus_gsi_callback_module: could not verify credential
>> globus_gsi_callback_module: error with signing policy
>> globus_gsi_callback_module: error in OLD GAA  code: Could not get
>> policy info: minor status=201
>>
>> I also ran these test to check the validity of certificate and the
>> result was OK
>> openssl verify -CApath /etc/grid-security/certificates
>> -purpose sslclient ~/.globus/usercert.pem
>>
>> openssl verify -CApath /etc/grid-security/certificates -purpose
>> sslserver /etc/grid-security/hostcert.pem
>>
>> I wanted to know that, what is the difference between gt4.0.0 and
>> gt4.2.0 grid-proxy-init command, As I found that gt4.0.0 is using
>> globus_proxy_utils_0.14 and gt4.2.0 is using globus_proxy_utils_2.1.
>> Is it due to this or gt4.2.0 is using some extra fields.
>>
>> Can someone explain the difference as I could not get any material
>> on net regarding it.
>> Thanks
>> Mohammad Kashif
>> INFN, Cagliari, Italy
>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to