2005/12/19, Matt Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Daniel Pekelharing wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 15:29 +0100, David Necas (Yeti) wrote: > > > I'd recommend to simply compile and *test* the app > > > successively with Gtk+ 2.4, 2.2, 2.0 till it stops to > > > build/work. Although all 2.x versions are essentially > > > backward compatible, there were various subtle behavioural > > > changes that may prove critical just for your app and > > > something can behave oddly even if it builds. No > > > compatibility list will tell you that. > > > > > > If you do not care so much, requiring 2.6.0 should be a safe > > > bet. > > > > Thanks for the info! > > > > I guess I'll just go with requiring 2.6.0, > > seeing as the only older versions I have are in rpm packages, > > I don't think it would be easy to install them next to my current > > version... > guessing doenst seem to be the right way on that. >
Maybe to find the lowest version you (Daniel Pekelharing) should see a Changelog and/or index of desparected symbols. http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix03.html http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix04.html http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix05.html http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix06.html http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix07.html http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-0?rev=1.3254&view=markup http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-2?rev=1.4000&view=markup http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-4?rev=1.5367&view=markup http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-6?rev=1.6286&view=markup http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-8?rev=1.7010&view=markup Regards
_______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
