On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:51:54PM +0000, Carlos Pereira wrote: >> I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to >> use GL, GtkGlExt is "good enough" and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a >> good idea; > > 2) GtkGlExt is good enough for GTK-2.0, I never had a single problem with > GTKGLExt. > > 4) Scientific/engineering applications often use OpenGL,
Exactly. I've been using GtkGLExt in a scientific app for years and I'm quite happy with it. Cutter does not cut it if you need to visualize scientific data in 3D. Unfortunately, scientific/engineering apps seems to *be* niche use. Look at how hard SourceForge tries to hide this software category even though it contains 50× more projects than VoIP which is promimently displayed... So I hope something like GtkGLExt will continue to be available, whether it's called GtkGLExt or not and is integrated into Gtk+ or not. Yeti _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
