On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Yevgen Muntyan wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Why not introduce a new check, some g_check_stuff() which would
> do what you propose? And let g_assert() be what it is, a glib analog
> of C assert(). When an assertion fails, you can't possibly expect the
> code to function in any meaningful way, e.g.
>
> int idx;
> ....
> g_assert (idx >= 0);
> array[idx] = 8;
>
> you get segfault or worse here if g_assert() above fails to bring program
> down, you simply can't change g_assert() now to behave in such a
> different way.
please reread my reasoning about G_DISABLE_ASSERT, there already is no behavior
of g_assert() you could rely on. (and some distributions do build their
binaries with G_DISABLE_ASSERT and/or G_DISABLE_CHECKS defined).
if you really meant the above assertion as an essential program
logic part and want to depend on the program exiting before array[]
is accessed, you already have to use if (idx >= 0) g_error ("off bounds");
> Best regards,
> Yevgen
---
ciaoTJ
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
