On 10/12/07, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 14:40 +0200, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
>
> > So I guess what you really want is some kind of "g_soft_assert" or some
> > "g_warn_if_fail".
>
> +1 on a g_warn_if_fail() API addition.
What is wrong with:
if (!everything_is_ok)
g_warning ("blaha");
? Those double or triple negatives that the *_if_fail routines
introduce always confuses me: g_return_if_fail (!(flag != SOMETHING &&
x)); ugh..
--
mvh Björn
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
