On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Morten Welinder wrote: >> nobody has to use this syntax. you can stick to the ever simple: >> g_assert (foo > bar); >> >> however if you want the value of 'foo' and 'bar' be printed out, instead >> of just the value of (foo > bar) which would be 0 or 1, then there are >> no other means than using something simialr to: >> g_assert_cmpfloat (foo, >, bar); > > No other way? You just need to think outside the box^w^wcpp. How > about a pre-cpp filter that looks at the source code, finds the g_assert, > and does a little creative rewriting?
how about that? bad. we don't use a preprocessor like moc before cpp+cc. if we did, GObject would look a million times different. people are coding such a thing after the fact these days though, look at vala to see how it looks like. also, for some out of the box thinking, see: http://blogs.gnome.org/timj/2007/07/14/13072007-switch-on-strings-in-c-and-c/ > Morten --- ciaoTJ _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
