On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > On 07/11/2007, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How about token concatenation[1]? i have to use that already for the current implementation, see my recent header: http://git.imendio.com/?p=timj/glib-testing.git;a=blob;f=glib/gtestframework.h;hb=617f2d3398e969bc2c38e1e6138a98cfaf91c7b9 > If anybody agrees with me that we must have an IDE friendly syntax, or have > other reasons to believe that > > g_assert_cmpint (1, G_EQUALS, 2); i don't quite see the benefit here. if there was a need to avoid the operator notation however, i'd definitely prefer something like: g_assert_int_lt (1, 2); g_assert_int_le (1, 2); g_assert_int_eq (1, 2); g_assert_int_ne (1, 2); for <, <=, ==, != respectively. > I shall gladly make it into a real implementation. Tim? > > Cheers, > Mikkel --- ciaoTJ _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
