2008/3/26, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Alberto Ruiz wrote: > > 2008/3/26, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> Hi Murray, > >> > >> I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language > >> bindings are about other languages which are available for use with > >> GTK+. This is not GNOME. I really think having a small GNOME foot (or > >> another icon) for indication purposes in another column is sufficient > >> for this. I think it is a mistake to make the point of showing certain > >> bindings as "first class" bindings purely because they are supported by > >> GNOME. > >> > > > > Still, we need a way to tell people that some bindings are better than > > others: > > > > I would suggest to remove any bindings not supported since 2.6 from the > main > > list, that would pretty much leave the actively maintained and most > popular > > Gtk+ bindings on the list (most of those are already on the GNOME > binding > > set btw). Then we can promote the most popular bindings to the highest > > places. > > > > Does this makes sense? > > > Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten. > I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support > perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember). > > This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is that > it will definitely become out of date unless someone actively checks up > on all bindings. That is probably also why the bindings on there are > mostly out of date for a lot of languages.
I volunteer myself to do some sort of binding review as long as I can get access to update the page. (For example, the Ada bindings supports 2.10already). -- Cheers, Alberto Ruiz
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
