On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:44 +0100, Emmanuel Briot wrote: > > Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten. > > I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support > > perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember). > > > > This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is > > that it will definitely become out of date unless someone actively > > checks up on all bindings. That is probably also why the bindings on > > there are mostly out of date for a lot of languages. > > Speaking as one of the maintainers for the Ada binding, it is > up-to-date for gtk+ 2.8, and partially for 2.10. Should I > convey this information by some other means to maintainers ?
As I said before in this thread, the page used to have a sentence suggesting that you tell the language-bindings list about new or changed information. I then made those changes every few weeks. That allowed the page to be as correct as the bindings authors wanted it to be. But maintainership of this page has apparently been taken away from me. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
