On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Ville M. Vainio <vivai...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:19 PM, David Zeuthen <da...@fubar.dk> wrote: > >> So I don't really know about bindings. I kind of assumed most other >> languages had their own bindings in place based on libdbus since that's >> pretty much what libdbus is all about. > > Unfortunately (?), the raw libdbus is easier (and more reliable > dependency) than what else is available. I took a glimpse at dbus-glib > binding, and didn't see the reason it would be the "easier" binding. I > believe libdbus is presented too bad a light in the api docs.
Well, if you're using DBus at all, it's very often the best design to structure your application around a mainloop. If you can/already-do depend on GLib, then it just makes sense to use dbus-glib at least for the mainloop integration and other fundamental bits. But beyond that, yes - whether the object mapping dbus-glib provides is useful depends on your use case. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
