Hi, On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:19 PM, David Zeuthen <da...@fubar.dk> wrote: > > So, to sum up, the main suggestions you are making are > > - Rework low-level bits of EggDBus so it's like dbus-hippo-helper > > - Don't try to hide libdbus in the low-level bits > (but do hide it from the high-level bits) > > - make sure the all gunk needed for the C/GObject binding is separate > from the low-level stuff (a separate library even?) > > Is that about right? >
Yup, I think that's fair, and thanks for wading through my mails. I'm not sure whether separating the C object mapping into another library is necessary or not; could go either way. To me the important thing is to separate it "conceptually" (have the dependencies flowing in the right direction / have the lower-level bits work by themselves). I could also see a phased approach where the binding helper stuff is finished and API-locked before the C object mapping, but that may not be useful. Havoc _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
