On Jun 8, 2010, at 5:42 PM, John Ralls wrote: > It's too early for requirements. First we need to figure out what to > abstract, and whether each abstraction really belongs in Gdk or should be > moved "up" to Gtk (like clipboards) or "down" to Glib (like string > conversions). Wikis are like whiteboards: They're a useful aid to a > discussion but not a vehicle for the discussion itself. > > So if you want to start a wiki page, maybe you start a list of what Gdk > abstracts, and we can discuss here where (i.e., GLib, Gdk, Gtk, or somewhere > else, including Cairo and Pango) each of those abstractions belong. We could > also consider whether there are abstractions in other libraries which would > fit more naturally into Gdk.
This is actually more or less what I meant. Listing what GDK abstracts and start drafting how this may be improved. I think "requirements" was the wrong choice of words on my side :) regards, -kris. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
