On Jun 9, 2010, at 1:31 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: > On Jun 8, 2010, at 5:42 PM, John Ralls wrote: >> It's too early for requirements. First we need to figure out what to >> abstract, and whether each abstraction really belongs in Gdk or should be >> moved "up" to Gtk (like clipboards) or "down" to Glib (like string >> conversions). Wikis are like whiteboards: They're a useful aid to a >> discussion but not a vehicle for the discussion itself. >> >> So if you want to start a wiki page, maybe you start a list of what Gdk >> abstracts, and we can discuss here where (i.e., GLib, Gdk, Gtk, or somewhere >> else, including Cairo and Pango) each of those abstractions belong. We could >> also consider whether there are abstractions in other libraries which would >> fit more naturally into Gdk. > > This is actually more or less what I meant. Listing what GDK abstracts and > start drafting how this may be improved. I think "requirements" was the > wrong choice of words on my side :) >
Oh, and keep in mind extended input devices, tablets, etc. including hot-plug. The current GTK documentation is from GTK 1.x, and things are in need of updating even for X11. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
